S.J. Quinney College of Law

• Jorge L. Contreras & Kenneth C. Shadlen, Contrasting academic approaches to COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution: What can the Oxford and Texas experiences teach us about pandemic response? Health Affairs Scholar, Jan. 31, 2024
• Steven Joffe, Rena M. Conti, Jorge L. Contreras, Emily A. Largent, Holly Fernandez Lynch, David Mitchell, Rachel E. Sachs, Allison M. Whelan, Matthew S. McCoy, Access to Affordable Medicines: Obligations of Universities and Academic Medical Centers, 30(6) Gene Therapy (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, “In the Public Interest” – University Technology Transfer and the Nine Points Document – An Empirical Assessment, 13 U. Irvine L. Rev. (2023)
• Steven Joffe, Rena Conti, Jorge Contreras, Emily Largent, Holly Lynch, David Mitchell, Rachel Sachs, Allison Whelan, Matthew McCoy, Access to Affordable Medicines: Obligations of Universities and Academic Medical Centers, 30(6) Gene Therapy (2023)
• Jeff Carter-Johnson, Jennifer Carter-Johnson & Jorge L. Contreras, University Research and Licensing in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 133 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Marc D. Rinehart, Conflicts of Interest and Academic Research in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer 7, 143-65 (Jacob Rooksby, ed., Edward Elgar: 2020)

• Jorge L. Contreras & Dave Fagundes, Michael Oher, Mike Tyson and the question of whether you own your life story, The Conversation, Aug. 31, 2023 (syndicated and reprinted in Fortune, MSN/UPI, goSkagit, SFGate, Albany Times Union, AlterNet, NewsBreak, Newsify, Post.news, The Wire, News24, etc.)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Dave Fagundes, The Life Story Rights Puzzle, 14(2) Harv. J. Sports Ent. L. 501 (2023, forthcoming)
• Dave Fagundes & Jorge L. Contreras, Private Ownership of Public Facts: Docudramas, Deals, and Life Story Rights, 57(2) UC Davis L. Rev. (2023, forthcoming)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Science Fiction and the Law: A New Wigmorian Bibliography, 13 Harv. J. Sports Ent. L. 65-111 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Getting Real, Getting Personal: Fictions and Realities of Property Across Borders (review of Lionel Shriver, Property: Stories Between Two Novellas (2018) and Ayelet Waldman, Love & Treasure (2014)), 45(4) Fordham Intl. L. Rev. 639 (2022)
• Terry S. Kogan, How Photographs Infringe, 19 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 353 (2017)
• Terry S. Kogan, The Enigma of Photography, Depiction, and Copyright Originality, 25 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 869 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Andrew Hernacki, Copyright Termination and Technical Standards, 43 U. Baltimore L. Rev. 221-253 (2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, No Matter How Small … Property, Autonomy and State in Horton Hears a Who!, 58 N.Y. L. SCH. L. REV. 603-615 (2014)
• Terry S. Kogan, Photographic Reproductions, Copyright and the Slavish Copy, 35 Col. J. L. & Arts 445 (2012)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Art Auctioneer: Duties and Assumptions, 13 Hastings Comm. & Ent L.J. 717 (1991)

• Paul G. Cassell et al., Does Bail Reform Increase Crime? An Empirical Assessment of the Public Safety Implications of Bail Reform in Cook County, Illinois, 55 Wake Forest L. Rev. 933 (2020)

• Leslie E. Wolf, Natalie Ram, Jorge L. Contreras, Laura M. Beskow, Certificates of confidentiality: privileging research data, 11(1) J. L. & Biosciences https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsae003 (2024)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Kenneth C. Shadlen, Contrasting academic approaches to COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution: What can the Oxford and Texas experiences teach us about pandemic response? Health Affairs Scholar, Jan. 31, 2024
• Steven Joffe, Rena M. Conti, Jorge L. Contreras, Emily A. Largent, Holly Fernandez Lynch, David Mitchell, Rachel E. Sachs, Allison M. Whelan, Matthew S. McCoy, Access to Affordable Medicines: Obligations of Universities and Academic Medical Centers, 30(6) Gene Therapy (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Arti Rai, Orange Book Over-Declaration Of Pharmaceutical Patents: The Advantages Of Ex Ante Over Ex Post Review, Health Affairs Forefront, Dec. 13, 2023
• Natalie Ram, Jorge L. Contreras, Laura M. Beskow, Leslie E. Wolf, Constitutional Confidentiality, 80(4) Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1349-1437 (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Pathogen Genomes as Global Public Goods (And Why They Should Not Be Patented), 55 NYU J. Int’l L. & Policy 533-579 (2023)
• David Cyranoski, Jorge L. Contreras, Victoria T. Carrington, Intellectual property and assisted reproductive technology, 41 Nature Biotech. 14-20 (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, No Take-Backs: Moderna’s Attempt to Renege on Its Vaccine Patent Pledge, Bill of Health blog, Aug. 29, 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, US Federal Genomic Data Release and Access Policies in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 193 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras and Adrian Thorogood, Technical standards for bioinformatics and medical informatics in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 153 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Jeff Carter-Johnson, Jennifer Carter-Johnson & Jorge L. Contreras, University Research and Licensing in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 133 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Direct to Consumer Genomics and Personal Health Data in Consuming Genetics (I. Glenn Cohen, ed., Oxford Univ. Press: 2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Open COVID Pledge: Design, Implementation and Preliminary Assessment of an Intellectual Property Commons, 2021(4) Utah L. Rev. 833-924 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Is Biopharma Ready for the Standards Wars? 7 Tex. A&M J. Prop. L. 43-80 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics: A Critical Reassessment, 27 Mich. Tech. L. Rev. 1-54 (2020) (lead article)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Marc D. Rinehart, Conflicts of Interest and Academic Research in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ch. 7, 143-65 (Jacob Rooksby, ed., Edward Elgar: 2020)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The False Promise of Health Data Ownership, 94(4) N.Y.U. L. Rev. 624-61 (2019) (invited symposium)
• Luis Gil Abinader & Jorge L. Contreras, The Patentability of Genetic Therapies: CAR-T and Medical Treatment Exclusions Around the World, 34(4) Am. U. Intl. L.J. 705-762 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Genetic Property, 105(1) Geo. L.J. 1-54 (2016)

• J. Jonas Anderson,Why Do Judges Compete for (Patent) Cases?,William & Mary Law Review (with Paul Gugliuzza)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Extraordinary Writ or Ordinary Remedy? Mandamus at the Federal Circuit, 100Washington University Law Review 327 (2022) (with Paul Gugliuzza & Jason Rantanen)
• J. Jonas Anderson, Federal Judge Seeks Patent Cases, 71 Duke Law Journal 419 (2021) (with Paul Gugliuzza)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Court Capture, 59 Boston College Law Review1543 (2018)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Reining in a “Renegade” Court: TC Heartland and the Eastern District of Texas,39 Cardozo Law Review 1569 (2018)
• Jason R. Bartlett & Jorge L. Contreras, Rationalizing FRAND Royalties: Can Interpleader Save the Internet of Things? 36(2) Rev. Litig. 285-334 (2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Michael A. Eixenberger, Model Jury Instructions for Reasonable Royalty Patent Damages, 57 Jurimetrics J. 1 (2016)
• J. Jonas Anderson, Judicial Lobbying, 91 Washington Law Review 401 (2016)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Judge Shopping in the Eastern District of Texas, 48Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 539 (2016) (invited symposium)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Court Competition for Patent Cases, 163University of Pennsylvania Law Review 631 (2015)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Patent Dialogue, 92North Carolina Law Review 1049 (2014)
• J. Jonas Anderson,Congress as a Catalyst of Patent Reform at the Federal Circuit, 63American University Law Review 101 (2014)

• Jorge L. Contreras, Genetic Patents and the Sustainable Development Goals in The Elgar Companion to Intellectual Property and the Sustainable Development Goals 121-141 (Matthew Rimmer, Caroline B. Ncube & Bita Amani, eds., Edward Elgar, 2024)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Bronwyn H. Hall & Christian Helmers, Pledging Patents for the Public Good: Rise and Fall of the Eco-Patent Commons, 57 Houston L. Rev. 61-109 (2019)
• Jesse L. Reynolds, Jorge L. Contreras & Joshua D. Sarnoff, Intellectual Property Policies for Solar Geoengineering, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1-7 (2018)
• Jesse L. Reynolds, Jorge L. Contreras & Joshua D. Sarnoff, Solar Climate Engineering and Intellectual Property: Toward a Research Commons, 18 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 1-110 (2017) (lead article)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Standards and Related Intellectual Property Issues for Climate Change Technology, in Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Climate Change at 414-436 (Joshua D. Sarnoff, ed., Edward Elgar: 2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Charles R. McManis, Intellectual Property Landscape of Material Sustainability Standards, 14 Columbia Sci. & Tech. L. Rev. 485-513 (2013)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Standards, Patents and the National Smart Grid, 32 Pace L. Rev. 641 (2012) (symposium issue)
• Jorge L. Contreras, In the Village Square: Risk Misperception and Decisionmaking in the Regulation of Low-Level Radioactive Waste, 19 Ecology L.Q. 481 (1992)

• Sean M. Fiil-Flynn, Brandon Butler, Michael Carroll, Or Cohen-Sasson, Carys Craig , Lucie Guibault, Peter Jaszi, Bernd Justin Jütte, Ariel Katz, João Pedro Quintais, Thomas Margoni, Allan Rocha de Souza, Matthew Sag, Rachael Samberg, Luca Schirru, Martin Senftleben, Ofer Tur-Sinai, Jorge L. Contreras, Legal reform to enhance global text and data mining research, 378 Science 951 (2022)
• Terry S. Kogan, How Photographs Infringe, 19 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 353 (2017)
• Terry S. Kogan, The Enigma of Photography, Depiction, and Copyright Originality, 25 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 869 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Andrew Hernacki, Copyright Termination and Technical Standards, 43 U. Baltimore L. Rev. 221-253 (2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Confronting the Crisis in Scientific Publishing: Latency, Licensing and Access, 53 Santa Clara L. Rev. 491-575 (2013)
• Terry S. Kogan, Photographic Reproductions, Copyright and the Slavish Copy, 35 Col. J. L. & Arts 445 (2012)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Open Access Scientific Publishing and the Developing World, 8 St Antony’s Intl. Rev. 43 (2012)

• Defining ‘Victim’ Through Harm: Crime Victim Status in the Crime Victims’ Rights Act and Other Victims’ Rights Enactments, __ American Criminal Law Review __ (forthcoming 2023).
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Circumventing the Crime Victims’ Rights Act: A Critical Analysis of the Eleventh Circuit’s Decision Upholding Jeffrey Epstein’s Secret Non-Prosecution Agreement, 2021 Mich. St. L. Rev. 211 (2021)
• Paul G. Cassell, Transforming Crime Victims’ Rights: From Myth to Reality, 45 Int’l J. of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 1 (2020) (with Robyn Holder and Tyrone Kirchengast)
• Paul G. Cassell, Protecting Crime Victims in State Constitutions: The Example of the New Marsy’s Law for Florida, 110 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 99 (2020) (with Margaret Garvin)
• Paul G. Cassell et al., The Amy, Vicky, and Andy Act: A Modest Step Forward Towards Full Restitution for Child Pornography Victims, 31 Federal Sentencing Rept’r 187 (Feb. 2019)
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Not Just ‘Kiddie Porn’: The Real Harms from Possession of Child Pornography, appearing in Refining Child Pornography Law in Crime, Language, and Social Consequences (2016)
• Paul G. Cassell, Introduction: The Maturing Victims’ Rights Movement, 13 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 1 (2015)
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Protecting Crime Victims’ Rights Before Charges Are Filed: The Need for Expansive Interpretation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act and Similar State Statutes, 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59 (2014)
• Paul G. Cassell, Full Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography Crimes, 82 George Washington L. Rev. 61 (2013) (with James Marsh and Jeremy Christiansen)
• Paul G. Cassell , The Victims’ Rights Amendment: A Sympathetic, Clause-By-Clause Analysis of the Proposal, 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 301 (2012)
• Paul G. Cassell, In Defense of Victim Impact Statements, 6 Ohio State J. Crim. Law 611 (2009)
• Paul G. Cassell, Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861
• Paul G. Cassell, Crime Shouldn’t Pay: A Proposal to Create an Effective and Constitutional Federal Anti-Profiting Statute, 19 Federal Sentencing Reporter 119 (2006)
• Paul G. Cassell, Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 2005 BYU L. Rev. 835 (2005)
• Paul G. Cassell, The Victim’s Right to Attend Trials: The Reascendant National Consensus, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 481(2005) (with Douglas Beloof).

Matthew Tokson, Supreme Court Clerks and the Death Penalty, 88 George Washington L. Rev. Arguendo 48 (2020) (symposium essay)

• Amos N. Guiora, Cybersecurity: A Cooperation Model, in Towards a New Enlightenment? A Transcendent Decade (2019).
• Amos N. Guiora, Cybersecurity: Geo-politics, Law and Policy (2017).

• Jorge L. Contreras, Direct to Consumer Genomics and Personal Health Data in Consuming Genetics (I. Glenn Cohen, ed., Oxford Univ. Press: 2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The False Promise of Health Data Ownership, 94(4) N.Y.U. L. Rev. 624-661 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Francisca Nordfalk, Liability (and) Rules for Health Information, 29 Health Matrix: J. L.-Med. 179 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Do You Own Your Genetic Test Results? What About Your Temperature?, Bill of Health Blog, May 13, 2019
• Jorge L. Contreras, John Rumbold, Barbara Pierscionek, Patient data ownership. 319 J. Am. Med. Assn. 935 (Mar. 6, 2018) (letter to editor)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Genetic Property, 105(1) Geo. L.J. 1-54 (2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Property Rules and Liability Rules for Genetic Data, Balkinization blog, Mar. 26, 2015

• Paul G. Cassell, Protecting the Innocent: A Response to the Bedau-Radelet Study, 41 Stanford L. Rev. 121 (1988) (with Stephen J. Markman).
• Paul G. Cassell, In Defense of the Death Penalty, Journal of the Institute for the Advancement of Criminal Justice 15 (Summer 2008), reprinted in The Prosecutor (2009).

• Teneille R. Brown, Treating Addiction in the Clinic, Not the Courtroom: using neuroscience and genetics to abandon the failed war on drugs, 54 Indiana Law Review 29 (2021).
• Brown, Teneille, The Role of Dehumanization in our Response to Substance Use Disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry Vol. 11 (2020).

• Amos N. Guiora, Established the Bystander Initiative
• Amos N. Guiora, Failing to Protect the Vulnerable: The Dangers of Institutional Complicity and Enablers, 2022 U. Ill. L. Rev __ (forthcoming 2022).
• Amos N. Guiora and Jessie Dyer, Bystander Legislation: He Ain’t Heavy, He’s My Brother, Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 29 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 291 (2020).
• AMOS N. GUIORA, ARMIES OF ENABLERS: SURVIVOR STORIES OF COMPLICITY AND BETRAYAL IN SEXUAL ASSAULTS (2020).
• AMOS N. GUIORA, THE CRIME OF COMPLICITY: THE BYSTANDER IN THE HOLOCAUST (2017).

• Teneille R. Brown, The Content of Our Character , 125 Penn State Law Review__ (forthcoming 2021).
• Louisa M. A. Heiny & Emily Nuvan, Toward a More Perfect Trial: Amending Federal Rules of Evidence 106 and 803 to Complete the Rule of Completeness, J. Crim. L. and Criminology 112 __ (forthcoming 2021).
• Louisa M. A. Heiny, Do You See What I See? Litigating Utah Rule of Evidence 617 Part II, 34 Utah Bar Journal 18 (2021).
• Louisa M. A. Heiny, Do You See What I See? The Science Behind Utah Rule of Evidence 617, Utah Bar Journal (March/ April 2021)

[see also Open Source, Data Sharing and Commons]

• Jorge L. Contreras, Genetic Patents and the Sustainable Development Goals in The Elgar Companion to Intellectual Property and the Sustainable Development Goals 121-141 (Matthew Rimmer, Caroline B. Ncube & Bita Amani, eds., Edward Elgar, 2024)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Genomic Data Sharing and Intellectual Property in Genomic Data Sharing: Case Studies, Challenges, and Opportunities for Precision Medicine 189 (Jennifer McCormick & Jyotishman Pathak, eds., Academic Press: 2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Pathogen Genomes as Global Public Goods (And Why They Should Not Be Patented), 55 NYU J. Int’l L. & Policy (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Genomic Data Sharing and Intellectual Property in Genomic Data Sharing: Case Studies, Challenges, and Opportunities for Precision Medicine 189 (Jennifer McCormick & Jyotishman Pathak, eds., Academic Press: 2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, US Federal Genomic Data Release and Access Policies in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 193 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Christi J. Guerrini, Jorge L. Contreras, Whitney Bash Brooks, Isabel Canfield, Meredith Trejo, Amy L. McGuire, “Idealists and capitalists”: ownership attitudes and preferences in genomic citizen science, New Genetics & Soc’y, doi:10.1080/14636778.2022.2063827 (2022).
• Jorge L. Contreras, Direct to Consumer Genomics and Personal Health Data in Consuming Genetics (I. Glenn Cohen, ed., Oxford Univ. Press: 2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Don’t Let Gene Patents Make a Comeback, CNN Opinion, Oct. 21, 2021
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Civil Rights Challenge to Gene Patenting, Bill of Health blog, Oct. 19, 2021
• Jorge L. Contreras, Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics: A Critical Reassessment, 27 Michigan Technology Law Review 1 (2020)
• Christi J. Guerrini & Jorge L. Contreras, Credit for and Control of Research Outputs in Genomic Citizen Science, 21 Annual Review of Genomics & Human Genetics 465 (2020)
• Luis Gil Abinader & Jorge L. Contreras, The Patentability of Genetic Therapies: CAR-T and Medical Treatment Exclusions Around The World, 34 Am. U. Intl. L.J. 705-762 (2019)
• Alexis K. Juergens & Leslie P. Francis, Protecting essential information about genetic variants as trade secrets: a problem for public policy? 5 J.L. Biosciences 682 (2019)
• Jacob S. Sherkow & Jorge L. Contreras, Intellectual Property, Surrogate Licensing, and Precision Medicine, 7 Intell. Prop. Theory 1-19 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Is CRISPR Different? Considering Exclusivity for Research Tools, Therapeutics and Everything In Between, 18 Am J. Bioethics 59 (2018) (Open Peer Commentary)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Jacob S. Sherkow, CRISPR, surrogate licensing, and scientific discovery, 355 Science 698-700 (2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Narratives of Gene Patenting, 43 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1133-1199 (2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Book Review: NEXT and Michael Crichton’s Five-Step Program for Biotechnology Law Reform, 48 Jurimetrics 337 (2008)

• Amos N. Guiora, Accountability and Effectiveness in Homeland Security, Univ. of Utah Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 057-08-02 (2008).
• Amos N. Guiora, International Cooperation in Homeland Security, Univ. of Utah Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 057-08-09 (2008).
• Amos N. Guiora, Framing Homeland Security, Univ. of Utah Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 57-07-11 (2008).
• Amos N. Guiora, Updating the Commander’s Toolbox: New Tools for Operationalizing the Law of Armed Conflict, PRISM: A Journal of the Center for Complex Operations, 1:3 (2010) (with Laurie R. Blank).
• Amos N. Guiora, Teaching Old Dog New Tricks: Operationalizing the Law of Armed Conflict in New Warfare, 1 Harvard National Security Journal 45 (2010) (with Laurie R. Blank)
• Amos N. Guiora, Targeted Killing as Active Self-Defense, 36 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L. 319 (2004).
• Amos N. Guiora, Determining a Legitimate Target: The Dilemma of the Decision Maker, 47 Tex. Int’l L.J. (2012)
• Amos N. Guiora, Homeland Security: Definitions and Accountability, The International Journal of Human Rights, 18:2, 241-262 (2014)
• Amos N. Guiora, The Legal and Ethical Limits of Technological Warfare: Introduction, 2013 Utah L Rev. 1215 (2014).
• Amos N. Guiora, Homeland Security: Definitions and Accountability and Dilemmas in the Surveillance of Houses of Worship, in Contingencies, Resilience and Legal Constitutionalism (Clive Walker and Genevieve Lennon, Eds., 2015)
• Amos N. Guiora, In the Crosshairs of Unfettered Executive Power: The Moral Dilemmas of Justifying and Carrying Out Targeted Killings, in The Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics, (George R. Lucas, Jr. Ed., 2015) (with Jason B. Shelton).
• Amos N. Guiora, Boston to Where: The Challenges Posed by Local-Global Terrorism, in Ashgate Companion on Military Ethics (James Turner Johnson and Eric Patterson, Eds., 2014)
• Amos N. Guiora, A Legal Framework for Targeted Killing, in Patriots Debate: Contemporary issues in National Security Law (ABA Publishing: 2013) (with Monica Hakimi).
• Amos N. Guiora, A 3Am Phone Call: The Legality of Targeted Killings Grounded in Criteria-Based Decision-Making Processes, in The Journalists’ Guide to National Security Law (Rosenzweig, McNulty, Shearer Eds., 2012).
• Amos N. Guiora, Targeting Killing: A Proposal for Criteria Based Decision Making, in Targeted Killing: Law and Morality in An Asymmetrical World (C. Finkelstein et al. Eds., 2012).
• Amos N. Guiora, A Critical Decision Point on The Battlefield: Friend, Foe or Innocent Bystander, in Security: A Multidisciplinary Normative Approach (C. Bailliet, Ed., 2009) (with Matthew W. Ezzo)
• Amos N. Guiora, Civilian Targets: Legal Responses to an Illegal Tactic, in International Criminal Law (Cherif Bassiouni Ed, 3rd Ed. 2008).

• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Ashby v. State: Appeal of Denial of Factual Innocence Petition, Utah Supreme Court, Case No. 20210330-SC
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Anselmo v. State: Consultant on Appeal of Denial of Post-Conviction DNA Testing, Nevada Supreme Court, Case No. 81382
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Bennett v. State: Consultant on Appeal of Denial of Factual Innocence Petition, Nevada Supreme Court, Case No. 82495
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Gordon v. State: Post-Conviction Remedies Act Petition, Utah District Court, Case No. 200902334
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Rodriguez v. State: Consultant on Petition for Post-Conviction DNA Testing, Nevada District Court 1-21-830461
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Seka v. State: Consultant on State’s Appeal of Grant of New Trial based upon Post-Conviction DNA Testing and Petition for Rehearing, Nevada Supreme Court, Case No. 80925
• Anderson, Jensie L., In Re. Wright v. State: Amicus in Support of Petition for Certiorari, Utah Supreme Court No. 20210191-SC
• Paul G. Cassell, Overstating America’s Wrongful Conviction Rate? Reassessing the Conventional Wisdom About the Incidence of Wrongful Convictions, 60 Ariz. L. Rev. 815 (2018)
• Paul G. Cassell, Jurisdiction-Specific Wrongful Conviction Rate Estimates: The North Carolina and Utah Examples, 60 Ariz. L. Rev. 891 (2018).
• Paul G. Cassell, Tradeoffs Between Wrongful Convictions and Wrongful Acquittals: Analyzing the Risks and Avoiding the Risks, 48 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1435 (2018)
• Paul G. Cassell, Can We Protect the Innocent Without Freeing the Guilty? Thoughts on the Innocence Movement and Avoiding Harmful Tradeoffs, in Wrongful Convictions and the DNA Revolution in Twenty Five Years of Freeing the Innocent (2017) (reprinted in The Wrongful Convictions Reader (2018).
• Paul G. Cassell, Freeing the Guilty Without Protecting the Innocence: Some Skeptical Observations on Proposed New ‘Innocence’ Procedures, 56 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 1063 (2012).

• Jorge L. Contreras, The European Commission’s Proposed SEP Regulation – A Missed Opportunity for Meaningful Reform? CPI TechReg Chron., Nov. 28, 2023
• Peter Georg Picht & Jorge L. Contreras, Proportionality Defenses in FRAND Cases: A Comparative Assessment of the Revised German Patent Injunction Rules and U.S. Case Law, 72(5) GRUR Intl. 435-50 (2023)
• Peter K. Yu, Jorge L. Contreras, Yu Yang, Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, 71 U. L. Rev. 1537-1618 (2022)
• Sean M. Fiil-Flynn, Brandon Butler, Michael Carroll, Or Cohen-Sasson, Carys Craig , Lucie Guibault, Peter Jaszi, Bernd Justin Jütte, Ariel Katz, João Pedro Quintais, Thomas Margoni, Allan Rocha de Souza, Matthew Sag, Rachael Samberg, Luca Schirru, Martin Senftleben, Ofer Tur-Sinai, Jorge L. Contreras, Legal reform to enhance global text and data mining research, 378 Science 951 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, National FRAND Rate-Setting Legislation: A Cure for International Jurisdictional Competition in Standards-Essential Patent Litigation? CPI Antitrust Chron., Jul. 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patents on 5G Standards Are not Matters of National Security, 53(6) Int’l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition 849 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Getting Real, Getting Personal: Fictions and Realities of Property Across Borders (review of Lionel Shriver, Property: Stories Between Two Novellas (2018) and Ayelet Waldman, Love & Treasure (2014)), 45(4) Fordham Intl. L. Rev. 639 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Anti-Suit Injunctions and Jurisdictional Competition in Global FRAND Litigation: The Case for Judicial Restraint, 11(2) NYU IP & Ent L. 171 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Letter from America: US Support for a WTO Waiver of COVID-19 Intellectual Property, 56 Intereconomics Rev. European Economic Policy 179 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Peter Georg Picht, Are PAEs Different? The Legal Treatment of Patent Assertion Entities in Europe and the United States, 2 IEEE Communication Standards 80 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Private Law, Conflicts of Law, and a Lex Mercatoria of Standards Development Organizations, 2019 Eur. Rev. Private L. 245-68 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Fabian Gaessler, Christian Helmers & Brian J. Love, Litigation of Standards-Essential Patents in Europe: A Comparative Analysis, 32 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1457-87 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Considerations Regarding a Canadian Patent Collective, CIGI Papers No. 172, Apr. 2018
• Jorge L. Contreras, Rohini Lakshané & Paxton Lewis, Patent Working Requirements and Complex Products, 7 NYU J. Intell. Prop. & Ent. L. 1-50 (2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Rohini Lakshané, Patents and Mobile Devices in India: An Empirical Survey, 50 Vand. Transnational L.J. 1-44 (2017)
• Colleen Chien and Jorge L. Contreras, “Made in India” Innovation Policy, SpicyIP blog, Sept. 19, 2016
• Charles R. McManis & Jorge L. Contreras, Compulsory Licensing of Intellectual Property: A Viable Policy Lever for Promoting Access to Critical Technologies? in TRIPS and Developing Countries – Towards a New IP World Order? (Gustavo Ghidini, Rudolph J.R. Peritz & Marco Ricolfi, eds., Edward Elgar: 2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patent-less Smartphone Innovation and Global Technology Markets, PatentProgress.org, Dec. 19, 2012

• Matthew Tokson, Blank Slates, 59 Boston College L. Rev. 591 (2018)
• Matthew Tokson, Judicial Resistance and Legal Change, 82 U. Chicago L. Rev. 901 (2015)
• Louisa M. A. Heiny, Jury Nullification: The Current State of the Law, University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 351.
• Wayne McCormack and Louisa M.A. Heiny, Judicial Process: Cases and Materials (2017).

• Amos N. Guiora and Louisa M.A. Heiny, Five Words That Changed America: Miranda V. Arizona And The Right To Remain Silent (2020).
• Paul G. Cassell, Still Handcuffing the Cops After all These Years: A Review of Fifty Years of Empirical Evidence of Miranda’s Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement, 97 Boston U.L. Rev. 687 (2017).
• Paul G. Cassell, The Paths Not Taken: A Critique of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Dickerson, 99 Mich. L. Rev. 898 (2001).
• Paul G. Cassell, Will Miranda Survive? Dickerson v. United States: The Right to Remain Silent, The Supreme Court, and Congress, 37 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1165 (2000).
• Paul G. Cassell, The Statute That Time Forgot: 18 U.S.C. § 3501 and the Overhauling of Miranda, 85 Iowa L. Rev. 175 (1999).
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Handcuffing the Cops? A Thirty Year Perspective on Miranda’s Effects on Law Enforcement, 50 Stanford L. Rev. 1055 (1998).
• Paul G. Cassell, Falling Clearance Rates After Miranda: Coincidence or Consequence?, 50 Stanford L. Rev. 1181 (1998).
• Paul G. Cassell, Miranda’s Negligible Effect on Law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations, 20 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 327 (1997).
• Paul G. Cassell, The Costs of the Miranda Mandate: A Lesson in the Dangers of Inflexible, ‘Prophylactic’ Supreme Court Inventions, 28 Ariz. St. L.J. 299 (1996).
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Police Interrogation in the 1990s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Miranda, 43 UCLA L. Rev. 839 (1996).
• Paul G. Cassell, All Benefits, No Costs: The Grand Illusion of Miranda’s Defenders, 90 Northwestern U.L. Rev. 1084 (1996).
• Paul G. Cassell, Miranda’s Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment, 90 Northwestern U.L. Rev. 387 (1996).

• Teneille R. Brown, From Bibles to Biomarkers: The Future of the DSM and Forensic Psychiatric Diagnosis , 2015 Utah Law Review 743 (2015).
• Brown, Teneille R. and Murphy, Emily R., Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant’s Past Mental States, 62 Stanford Law Review 1119 (2010).
• Lisa Aspinwall, Teneille Brown and Jim Tabery, The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths? Science Vol. 337, Issue 6096 (2012).

• Heather P. Nick, Kelsey Kehoe, Amanda Gannon, Jorge L. Contreras, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Researcher Knowledge, Attitudes, and Communication Practices for Genomic Data Sharing, 16 J. Empirical Res. Human Res. Ethics 125 (2020)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Kyle Schultz, Craig C. Teerlink, Tim Maness, Laurence J. Meyer, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Legal Terms of Use and Public Genealogy Websites, J.L. & Biosciences, LSAA063, 1-24 (2020)
• Tammy M. Frisby & Jorge L. Contreras, The NCI Cancer Moonshot Public Access and Data Sharing (PADS) Policy – Initial Assessment and Implications, 2 Data & Policy E9:1-11 (2020)
• Alexis K. Juergens & Leslie P. Francis, Protecting essential information about genetic variants as trade secrets: a problem for public policy? 5 J.L. Biosciences 682 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Bartha M. Knoppers, The Genomic Commons, 19 Ann. Rev. Genomics & Human Genetics 429-453 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Anticommons at 20: Concerns for Research Continue, 361 Science 335-337 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Leviathan in the Commons: Biomedical Data and the State, in Governing Medical Knowledge Commons, Ch. 2 (Katherine Strandburg, Brett Frischmann, Michael Madison eds., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Big Genomic Data and the State, in Big Data is Not a Monolith: Policies, Practices and Problems, Ch. 7 (Ekiba Hamid, Michael Mattioli & Cassidy Sugimoto, eds., MIT Press: 2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Optimizing Access Policies for Big Data Repositories: Latency Variables and the Genome Commons in Big Data Optimization: Recent Developments and Challenges, Ch. 9 (Ali Emrouzejnad, ed., Springer Intl.: 2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, NIH’s Genomic Data Sharing Policy: Timing and Tradeoffs, 31 Trends In Genetics 55 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Jerome H. Reichman, Sharing by Design: Data and Decentralized Commons, 350 Science 1312-1314 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Constructing the Genome Commons in Governing Knowledge Commons at Ch. 4, pp. 99-135 (Brett Frischmann, Michael Madison, Katherine Strandburg, eds., Oxford Univ. Press: 2014)
• Arthur L. Holden, Jorge L. Contreras, Sally John & Matthew R. Nelson, The International Serious Adverse Events Consortium, 13 Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 795 (2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Bermuda’s Legacy: Patents, Policy and the Design of the Genome Commons, 12(1) Minn. J.L., Sci. & Tech. 61-125 (2011)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Data Sharing, Latency Variables and Science Commons, 25 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1601-72 (2010)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Prepublication Data Release, Latency, and Genome Commons, 329 Science 393-394 (2010)

• David Cyranoski, Jorge L. Contreras, Victoria T. Carrington, Intellectual property and assisted reproductive technology, 41 Nature Biotech. 14-20 (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A More Progressive Progress, 102 BU L. Online 69 (2022)
• Victoria T. Carrington & Jorge L. Contreras, Assessing Responses to the PTO’s 2021 Patent Eligibility Study, Patently-O blog, Feb. 1, 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, Will NIH Learn from Myriad when Settling Its mRNA Inventorship Dispute with Moderna? Bill of Health blog, Jan. 6, 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patent Reality Checks—Eliminating Patents on Fake, Impossible and Other Inoperative Inventions, 102(1) J. Patent & Trademark Off. Soc’y 3 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, “Not” Madison, CPI Antitrust Chron., Jul. 2021
• Jorge L. Contreras, Shepardizing Patents, Patently-O blog, Jun. 16, 2021
• Jorge L. Contreras, Research and Repair: Expanding Exceptions To Patent Infringement In Response To A Pandemic, 7 J.L. & Biosciences 1-7 (2020)
• Jorge L. Contreras, “No License, No Problem” – Is Qualcomm’s Ninth Circuit Antitrust Victory a Patent Exhaustion Defeat? Patently-O blog, Sept. 1, 2020
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patent Fakes – How Fraudulent Inventions Threaten Public Health, Innovation and the Economy, Bill of Health blog, Jul. 2, 2020
• Yang Yu and Jorge L. Contreras, The Uncertain Criminal Status of PAE Litigation in China, Patently-O blog, Dec. 18, 2019
• Jonas Anderson,Empirical Studies of Claim Construction, inResearch Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law (Peter S. Menell & David L. Schwartz, eds., 2019) (with Peter S. Menell)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Common Knowledge and Non-Patent Literature in the Internet Age, Berkeley Tech. L.J. Online Commentary (Mar. 12, 2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Michael A. Eixenberger, Model Jury Instructions for Reasonable Royalty Patent Damages, 57 Jurimetrics J. 1 (2016)
• Jonas Anderson,Specialized Standards of Review, 18Stanford Technology Law Review 151 (2015)
• Jonas Anderson,Restoring the Fact/Law Distinction in Patent Claim Construction,109 Northwestern University Law Review Online 187 (2015) (with Peter S. Menell) (invited contribution)
• Jorge L. Contreras, When is a Covenant Just a Covenant? Of Meso, Newman and Transactions with Patents, New Private Law blog, Nov. 9, 2015
• J. Jonas Anderson,Informal Deference: A Historical, Empirical, and Normative Analysis of Patent Claim Construction, 108Northwestern University Law Review 1 (2014) (with Peter S. Menell)
• Brief for Professors Peter S. Menell, J. Jonas Anderson, and Arti K. Rai as Amici Curiae, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., No. 13-854 (U.S. June 20, 2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Topsy-Turvy ITC, Infojustice.org, June 16, 2013
• Jorge L. Contreras, Vanishing Licenses – How International Bankruptcy Rules Could Threaten the Networked Patent Economy, PatentProgress.org, Nov. 26, 2012
• Jorge L. Contreras, Samsung’s Billion Dollar Question, Public Knowledge Policy Blog, Aug. 31, 2012
• Jorge L. Contreras, Wilson Sporting Goods and Hypothetical Patent Claims: A New Slice at the Doctrine of Equivalents, 1 Fed. Cir. Bar J. 11 (1991)

• Jorge L. Contreras, No Take-Backs: Moderna’s Attempt to Renege on Its Vaccine Patent Pledge, Bill of Health blog, Aug. 29, 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Open COVID Pledge: Design, Implementation and Preliminary Assessment of an Intellectual Property Commons, 2021 Utah L. Rev. 833 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Michael Eisen, Ariel Ganz, Mark Lemley, Jenny Molloy, Diane M. Peters, Frank Tietze, Pledging Intellectual Property for Covid-19, 38 Nature Biotechnology 1146 (2020)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Deconstructing Moderna’s COVID-19 Patent Pledge, Bill of Health blog, Oct. 21, 2020
• Jorge L. Contreras, Pledging Intellectual Property for Distributed Design in Viral Design – The COVID-19 Crisis as a Global Test Bed for Distributed Design (Distributed Design Platform, 2020)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Bronwyn H. Hall & Christian Helmers, Pledging Patents for the Public Good: Rise and Fall of the Eco-Patent Commons, 57 Houston L. Rev. 61-109 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The Evolving Patent Pledge Landscape, CIGI Papers No. 166, Apr. 3, 2018
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patent Pledges: Middle Ground Between the Public Domain and Patent Exclusivity, 2015 Mich. St. L. Rev. 788-792 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patent Pledges, 47(3) Ariz. St. L.J. 543-608 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Tesla Motors and the Rise of Non-ICT Patent Pledges, Patently-O blog, Jun. 16, 2014
• Jorge L. Contreras, Samsung Proposes a Patent Pledge to Settle EC FRAND Investigation, Patently-O blog, Oct. 21, 2013
• Jorge L. Contreras, Non-SSO Patent Commitments and Pledges, Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog, Oct. 14, 2013

• Matthew Tokson, The Aftermath of Carpenter: An Empirical Study of Fourth Amendment Law, 2018–2021, 135 Harvard L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2022)
• Matthew Tokson, Social Norms in Fourth Amendment Law, 119 Michigan L. Rev. __ (forthcoming 2021) (with Ari E. Waldman)
• Matthew Tokson, Inescapable Surveillance, 105 Cornell L. Rev. 409 (2021)
• Matthew Tokson, The Emerging Principles of Fourth Amendment Privacy, 88 George Washington L. Rev. 1 (2020)
• Matthew Tokson, 42nd Annual Foulston-Siefkin Lecture, The Next Wave of Fourth Amendment Challenges after Carpenter, reprinted in 59 Washburn L. Rev. 1 (2020)
• Matthew Tokson, The Normative Fourth Amendment, 104 Minnesota L. Rev. 741 (2019)
• Matthew Tokson, Knowledge and Fourth Amendment Privacy, 111 Northwestern U. L. Rev. 139 (2016)
• Matthew Tokson, Automation and the Fourth Amendment, 96 Iowa L. Rev. 581 (2011)
• Matthew Tokson, The Content/Envelope Distinction in Internet Law, 50 William & Mary L. Rev. 2105 (2009)

• Jorge L. Contreras & Jessica Maupin, Unenjoined Infringement and Compulsory Licensing, Berkeley Tech. L.J. (2023)
• John Jarosz, Jorge L. Contreras, Robert Vigil, Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Patent Cases: Repairing Irreparable Harm, 31(1) Intell. Prop. L.J. 63-130 (2023)
• Peter Georg Picht & Jorge L. Contreras, Proportionality Defenses in FRAND Cases: A Comparative Assessment of the Revised German Patent Injunction Rules and U.S. Case Law, 72(5) GRUR Intl. 435-50 (2023)
• Peter K. Yu, Jorge L. Contreras, Yu Yang, Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, 71 U. L. Rev. 1537-1618 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Martin Husovec, Issuing and Tailoring Patent Injunctions – A Cross-Jurisdictional Comparison and Synthesis in Injunctions in Patent Law: Trans-Atlantic Dialogues On Flexibility And Tailoring (Jorge L. Contreras & Martin Husovec, eds., Cambridge University Press: 2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Thomas F. Cotter, Sang Jo Jong, Brian J. Love, Nicolas Petit, Peter Georg Picht, Norman V. Siebrasse, Rafał Sikorski, Masabumi Suzuki and Jacques de Werra, The Effect of FRAND Commitments on Patent Remedies, in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus, ch. 5, 160-201 (C. Bradford Biddle, Jorge L. Contreras, Brian J. Love, Norman V. Siebrasse, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2019)
• Colleen V. Chien, Jorge L. Contreras, Thomas F. Cotter, Brian J. Love, Christopher B. Seaman, Norman V. Siebrasse, Enhanced Damages, Litigation Cost Recovery, and Interest in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus, ch. 3, 90-114 (C. Bradford Biddle, Jorge L. Contreras, Brian J. Love, Norman V. Siebrasse, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2019)
• Norman V. Siebrasse, Jorge L. Contreras, Thomas F. Cotter, John M. Golden, Sang Jo Jong, Brian J. Love, Rafał Sikorski and David O. Taylor Injunctive Relief in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus, ch. 4, 115-59 (C. Bradford Biddle, Jorge L. Contreras, Brian J. Love, Norman V. Siebrasse, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Injunctive Relief in U.S. Patent Cases in Patent Law Injunctions, Ch. 1 (Rafał Sikorski, ed., Wolters Kluwer: 2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Michael A. Eixenberger, Model Jury Instructions for Reasonable Royalty Patent Damages, 57 Jurimetrics J. 1 (2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Equity, Antitrust and the Reemergence of the Patent Unenforceability Remedy, Antitrust Source (Oct. 2011)

• Jorge L. Contreras & Magnus Buggenhagen, Standards Essential Utility Models, 64(1) Jurimetrics J. 1-40 (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The European Commission’s Proposed SEP Regulation – A Missed Opportunity for Meaningful Reform? CPI TechReg Chron., Nov. 28, 2023
• Peter Georg Picht & Jorge L. Contreras, Proportionality Defenses in FRAND Cases: A Comparative Assessment of the Revised German Patent Injunction Rules and U.S. Case Law, 72(5) GRUR Intl. 435-50 (2023)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Rudi Bekkers, C. Bradford Biddle, Enrico Bonadio, Michael A. Carrier, Bernard Chao, Charles Duan, Richard Gilbert, Joachim Henkel, Erik Hovenkamp, Martin Husovec, Kai Jakobs, Dong-hyu Kim, Mark A. Lemley, Brian J. Love, Luke McDonagh, Fiona Scott Morton, Jason Schultz, Timothy Simcoe, Jennifer M. Urban, Joy Xiang, Preserving the Royalty-Free Standards Ecosystem, 45(7) Intell. Prop. Rev. 371-375 (2023)
• Brief of Amicus Curiae Law and Economics Scholars in Support of Petition For Rehearing En Banc in Continental Automotive Sys., Inc. v. Avanci, L.L.C. (5^th, Apr. 19, 2022) (principal author)
• Peter K. Yu, Jorge L. Contreras, Yu Yang, Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, 71 U. L. Rev. 1537-1618 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A Statutory Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction for U.S. Patent Cases? Patently-O blog, Mar. 18, 2022
• Justus Baron, Jorge L. Contreras, Pierre Larouche, Balance and Standardization: Implications for Competition and Antitrust Analysis, 84(2) AntitrustJ. 301 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, National FRAND Rate-Setting Legislation: A Cure for International Jurisdictional Competition in Standards-Essential Patent Litigation? CPI Antitrust Chron., Jul. 2022
• Jorge L. Contreras, Patents on 5G Standards Are not Matters of National Security, 53(6) Int’l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Competition 849 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras and Adrian Thorogood, Technical standards for bioinformatics and medical informatics in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 153 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Peter K. Yu, Jorge L. Contreras, Yu Yang, Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, 71 U. L. Rev. 1537-1618 (2022)
• Rudi Bekkers, Elena M. Tur, Joachim Henkel, Tommy van der Vorst, Menno Driesse, Jorge L. Contreras, Overcoming inefficiencies in patent licensing: A method to assess patent essentiality for technical standards, 51 Research Pol. 104590 (2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Anti-Suit Injunctions and Jurisdictional Competition in Global FRAND Litigation: The Case for Judicial Restraint, 11(2) NYU IP & Ent L. 171 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras and Adrian Thorogood, Technical standards for bioinformatics and medical informatics in Bioinformatics, Medical Informatics and the Law 153 (Jorge L. Contreras, A. James Cuticchia & Gregory Kirsch, eds., Edward Elgar: 2022)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Thomas F. Cotter, Sang Jo Jong, Brian J. Love, Nicolas Petit, Peter Georg Picht, Norman V. Siebrasse, Rafał Sikorski, Masabumi Suzuki and Jacques de Werra, The Effect of FRAND Commitments on Patent Remedies, in Patent Remedies and Complex Products: Toward a Global Consensus, ch. 5, 160-201 (C. Bradford Biddle, Jorge L. Contreras, Brian J. Love, Norman V. Siebrasse, eds., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2019) (primary author)
• Jorge L. Contreras, HTC v. Ericsson – Ladies and Gentlemen, The Fifth Circuit Doesn’t Know What FRAND Means Either, Patently-O blog, Sep. 13, 2021
• Jorge L. Contreras, Rationalizing U.S. Standardization Policy: A Proposal For Institutional Reform, 35 Antitrust 41 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Is Biopharma Ready for the Standards Wars? 7 Tex. A&M J. Prop. L. 43-80 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Richard J. Gilbert, Non-Discrimination – FRAND’s Last Stand?, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, Dec. 2020
• Jorge L. Contreras, It’s Anti-suit Injunctions All the Way Down – the Strange New Realities of International Litigation over Standards-Essential Patents, IP Litigator, 14-21, July/August 2020
• Yang Yu and Jorge L. Contreras, Will China’s New Anti-Suit Injunctions Shift the Balance of Global FRAND Litigation? Patently-O blog, Oct. 22, 2020
• Jorge L. Contreras, Global Rate-Setting: A Solution for Standards Essential Patents? 94 Wash. L. Rev. 701-757 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Much Ado About Holdup, 2019 U. Ill. L. Rev. 875-905 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Technical Standards, Standards-Setting Organizations and Intellectual Property: A Survey of the Literature (With an Emphasis on Empirical Approaches), in Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. II – Analytical Methods 185 (Peter S. Menell & David Schwartz, eds., Edward Elgar: 2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, The New Extraterritoriality: FRAND Royalties, Anti-Suit Injunctions and the Global Race to the Bottom in Disputes over Standards-Essential Patents, 25 B.U. J. Sci. & Tech. L. 251-290 (2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Private Law, Conflicts of Law, and a Lex Mercatoria of Standards Development Organizations, 2019 Eur. Rev. Private L. 245-68 (2019)
• Justus Baron, Jorge L. Contreras, Pierre Larouche, Martin Husovec, Making the Rules: The Governance of Standard Development Organizations and their Policies on Intellectual Property Rights, JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 29655 (Nikolaus Thumm, ed., 2019)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Understanding ‘Balance’ Requirements for Standards Development Organizations, CPI Antitrust Chronicle, Sept. 2019
• Jorge L. Contreras, Fabian Gaessler, Christian Helmers & Brian J. Love, Litigation of Standards-Essential Patents in Europe: A Comparative Analysis, 32 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1457-87 (2018)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Rambus Redux? Standards, Patents and Non-Disclosure in the Pharmaceutical Sector (Momenta v. Amphastar), Patently-O blog, Jun. 29, 2018
• Jorge L. Contreras, From Private Ordering to Public Law: The Legal Framework Governing Standards-Essential Patents, 30 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 211-231 (2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Aggregated Royalties for Top-Down FRAND Determinations: Revisiting ‘Joint Negotiation’, 62(4) Antitrust Bulletin 690-709 (2017)
• Jason R. Bartlett & Jorge L. Contreras, Rationalizing FRAND Royalties: Can Interpleader Save the Internet of Things? 36(2) Rev. Litig. 285-334 (2017) (invited symposium)
• Jorge L. Contreras, National Disparities and Standards-Essential Patents: Considerations for India in Complications and Quandaries in the ICT Sector: Standard Essential Patents and Competition Issues, Ch. 1 (Ashish Bharadwaj, Vishwas H. Deviah & Indranath Gupta, eds., Springer: 2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Michael Eixenberger, The Anti-Suit Injunction: A Transnational Remedy for Multi-Jurisdictional SEP Litigation in Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents, Ch. 27 (Jorge L. Contreras, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Assertion of Standards-Essential Patents by Non-Practicing Entities in Patent Assertion Entities and Competition Policy, Ch. 4, 50-71 (D. Daniel Sokol, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2017)
• Jorge L. Contreras, When a Stranger Calls: Standards Outsiders and Unencumbered Patents, 12(3) J. Competition L. & Econ. 507-540 (2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A Tale of Two Layers: Patents, Standardization and the Internet, 93 Denver L. Rev. 855 (2016) (invited symposium)
• Jorge L. Contreras, FRAND Market Failure: IPXI’s Standards-Essential Patent License Exchange, 15 Chi-Kent J. Intell. Prop. 419 (2016)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Andrew Updegrove, A Primer on Intellectual Property Policies of Standards Bodies in Effective Standardization Management in Corporate Settings, Ch. 10 at 215-235 (Kai Jacobs, ed., IGI Global: 2016))
• Jorge L. Contreras & Richard J. Gilbert, A Unified Framework for RAND and other Reasonable Royalties, 30 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1447 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges, 2015 Utah L. Rev. 479-558 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Standards, Royalty Stacking and Collective Action, 3 CPI Antitrust Chron. (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras & Andrew Updegrove, A Practical Guide to Patent Policies of Standards Development Organizations, 67 Standards Engineering 1-6 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A Brief History of FRAND: Analyzing Current Debates in Standard-Setting and Antitrust through a Historical Lens, 80 Antitrust L.J. 39 (2015)
• Jorge L. Contreras, IEEE Amends its Patent (FRAND) Policy, Patently-O blog, Feb. 9, 2015
• Jorge L. Contreras, Divergent Patterns of Engagement in Internet Standardization: Japan, Korea and China, 38 Telecom. Policy 916 (2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras & David L. Newman, Developing A Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes, 2014 J. Dispute Resol. 23-50 (2014)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Why FRAND Commitments are not (usually) Contracts, Patently-O blog, Sept. 15, 2014
• Jorge L. Contreras, Fixing FRAND: A Pseudo-Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent Licensing, 79 Antitrust L.J. 47-97 (2013)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Technical Standards and Ex Ante Disclosure: Results and Analysis of an Empirical Study, 53 Jurimetrics 163-211 (2013)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Good Things Come in Threes? DOJ, FTC and EC Officials Wax Eloquent About FRAND, Patently-O blog, Oct. 29, 2012
• Jorge L. Contreras, The February of FRAND, Patently-O blog, Mar. 6, 2012
• Jorge L. Contreras, Equity, Antitrust and the Reemergence of the Patent Unenforceability Remedy, Antitrust Source (Oct. 2011)

• Amos N. Guiora, White Power in the U.S., Europe, and Israel, in Counterterrorism and Democratic Dilemmas: Effective and Ineffective Measures (Boaz Ganor and Ophir Falk, Eds.) (forthcoming 2022) (with Chelsea E. Joliet)
• Amos N. Guiora, From Bush to Trump: U.S. Counterterrorism Policy, in Terrorism and Counterterrorism After the Caliphate, (Afshin Ellian, Baastian Rijpkema, Gelijn, eds., 2020).
• Amos N. Guiora and Chelsea Joliet, Counter-Terrorism Policies and Challenges to Human Rights: A Case Study of The United States of America, in International Human Rights and Counterterrorism (Hoadley S. Ed., 2019)
• Amos N. Guiora, Inciting Terrorism on the Internet: The Limits of Tolerating Intolerance, in Incitement to Terrorism (Anne Bayefsky and Laurie R. Blank, Eds., 2018).
• Amos N. Guiora, Establishing A Drone Court: Restraints on The Executive Branch, in The Legitimacy of Drones: Investigating the Legality, Morality, and Efficacy of UCAVs for Counterterrorism, (Steven Barela, Ed., 2015) (with Jeff Brand)
• Amos N. Guiora, Homeland Security, in The Routledge Handbook of Law and Terrorism (Clive Walker and Genevieve Lennon, Eds., 2014)
• Amos N. Guiora, Homeland Security and the Inmate Population: The Risk and Reality of Islamic Radicalization in Prison, in Special Needs Offenders in Correctional Institutions (Lior Gideon Ed., 2012) (with Aaron Rappaport and Tinka Veldhuis).
• Amos N. Guiora, Human Rights and Counterterrorism: A Contradiction or Necessary Bedfellows? 46 Ga. L. Rev. (2012).
• Amos N. Guiora, Due Process and Terrorism, in ABA Standing Committee on Law and National Security 50th Anniversary: National Security Law: Fifty Years of Transformation from the Past to the Future: An Anthology (2012) (with Laurie R. Blank).
• Amos N. Guiora, Preempting Terror Bombings; A Comparative Approach to Anticipatory Self-Defense, 41 U of Toledo Law Rev. (2010)
• Amos N. Guiora, Counterterrorism and Employment: An Israeli Perspective, in Workplace Privacy: Proceedings NY 58Th Annual Conference on Labor (J. Nash and S. Estreicher Eds., 2010)
• Amos N. Guiora, The Importance of Values in the Fight Against Terrorism, in Values and Violence: Intangible Aspects of Terrorism (Ibrahim A Karawan, Wayne McCormack, And Stephen E. Reynolds Eds., 2008)
• Amos N. Guiora, Internationalization of Terrorism and its Limits in the Middle East, in Terrorism: Patterns of Internationalization (Ekaterina Stepanova & Jaideep Sakia Eds., 2008)
• Amos N. Guiora, National Objectives in the Hands of Junior Leaders: IDF Experiences in Combating Terror, in Countering Terrorism and Insurgency in the 21St Century (James Forest Ed., 2007)

Jorge L. Contreras, Trade Secrets (No. 85884) in Global Dictionary of Competition Law (Concurrences, 2023)

J. Jonas Anderson,Secret Inventions, 26Berkeley Technology Law Journal 917 (2011)

• Brad Biddle, Vigdis Bronder & Jorge Contreras, Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations, Joint Proceedings EURAS 2021: Standardisation and Innovation, SIIT 2021: The Past, Present and Future of ICT Standardisation 59 (Kai Jakobs, ed., 2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, Sui-Genericide, 106 Iowa L. Rev. 1041 (2021)
• Jorge L. Contreras, A Historical Note on The Assignment Of Pesticide Common Names, Standards Engineering, Nov/Dec 2020
• Jorge L. Contreras, Trademarks, Certification Marks and Technical Standards in Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law, Vol 2: Further Intersections of Public & Private Law (Jorge L. Contreras, ed., Cambridge Univ. Press: 2019)
• David B. Dellenbach, TMEP 818: A Valuable Resource for Trademark Practitioners, Workman Nydegger IP Sketchbook, Jan. 29, 2018
• David B. Dellenbach, Understanding Some of the Benefits and Risks of Intent-To-Use Trademark Applications in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Workman Nydegger IP Sketchbook, Nov. 20, 2017

• Amos N. Guiora, The Elor Azaria Case and the Murderer or Hero Dilemma, in March to Justice: Global Military Law Landmarks (Franklin Rosenblatt & Navdeep Singh, eds., 2021).
• Matthew Tokson, Virtual Confrontation: Is Videoconference Testimony by an Unavailable Witness Constitutional?, 74 U. Chicago L. Rev. 1581 (2007)

• Brown, Teneille R., Why We Fear Genetic Informants: Using Genetic Genealogy to Catch Serial Killers, Columbia Science & Technology Law Rev. 21(1):114-181(2019)
• Lisa Aspinwall, Teneille Brown and Jim Tabery, The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths? Science Vol 337, Issue 6096 (2012)
• Paul G. Cassell, Explaining the Recent Homicide Spikes in U.S. Cities: The ‘Minneapolis Effect’ and the Decline in Proactive Policing, 32 Federal Sentencing Rep. 83 (2020).
• Paul G. Cassell, What Caused the 2016 Chicago Homicide Spike? An Empirical Examination of the ‘ACLU Effect’ and the Role of Stop and Frisks in Preventing Gun Violence, 2018 Univ. of Illinois L. Rev. 1581 (2018).
• Paul G. Cassell et al., Sense and Sensibility in Mandatory Minimum Sentencing, 23 Federal Sentencing Reporter219 (2011) (with Erik Luna).